Galileo And Church Essay Research Paper Galileo free essay sample

Galileo And Church Essay, Research Paper Galileo, Science and the Church, by Jerome J. Langford, are about the tests and trials of Galileo with the Roman Catholic Church in the 1600? s. The church did non hold with Galileo? s thoughts ; chiefly theories associated with Copernican uranology. The primary purpose of Langford is to convey the truth of Galileo? s tests to his readers, and to demo that finally Galileo was correct in his theories and was non seeking to travel against the churches? belief. Galileo was simply seeking to seek truth in scientific discipline, and wanted to be known as a historical scientific figure. Therefore, Galileo was unjustly accused, ridiculed, and convicted of unorthodoxy. In Galileo? s defence of unorthodoxy, Langford writes, ? This was an unfortunate determination on several histories. First the Copernican sentiment was treated as dissident when, in world, it was non. ? ( 155 ) Langford goes on to explicate that the theological Consultors in 1616 recognized the Earth? s mobility as? officially dissident? , but this did non do the stationariness of the Earth a affair of religion. We will write a custom essay sample on Galileo And Church Essay Research Paper Galileo or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Catholic philosophers and theologists besides agree that the edict of the Holy Office did non do the stationariness of the Earth or the mobility of the Sun a affair of religion. These points clearly support the statement of Galileo? s unfair strong belief of unorthodoxy. Langford besides uses extracts of other Hagiographas to exemplify his chief points. The following is one of many extracts Langford uses: ? Inasmuch as no dogmatic determination was rendered in this instance, either on the portion of the Pope or on the portion of a Council ruled by the Pope and approved by him, it is non, by virtuousness of that edict of the Congregation, a philosophy of religion that the Sun is traveling and the Earth standing still? . Yet every Catholic is bound by virtuousness of obeisance to conform to the edict of the Congregation, or at least non to learn what is straight opposed to it. ? ( 156 ) This extract, as do many others, clearly support Langford? s statement. The church disagreed with Galileo? s ideas. They really went as far as stating Galileo that he was to halt prophesying his thoughts every bit long as he was involved with the church. Langford writes, ? Yet, remembering the tone of the prohibition, Urban conceded that so long as Galileo treated the Copernican theory as a hypothesis, he could compose all he wanted on the subject. ? ( 114 ) If he would go forth the church, he would be able to voice his sentiments and thoughts freely. I believe Langford? s clever usage of extracts ; turn out that he is non entirely in his belief that Galileo was wrongly accused. He besides gets his point across by observing that the stationariness of the Earth is non a affair of religion. This alone demonstrates that Galileo did non perpetrate unorthodoxy. My sentiment is that the church should hold allowed Galileo to voice his sentiment of the Copernican theory because he was seeking to seek the truth in scientific discipline, to break educate the universe, non seeking to travel straight against the church. Therefore, Langford has succeeded in his belief that Galileo was below the belt convicted of unorthodoxy.